Good news! It is no longer necessary to test foreign language papers for evaluating professional titles, and it is no longer a hard lever
BEIJING, Beijing, January 9 (Reporter Li Jinlei) The professional title system has ushered in great changes. The General Offices of the General Office of the Central Committee of the CPC and the State Council issued the Opinions on Deepening the Reform of Professional Title System on the 8th, demanding to overcome the tendency of "only academic qualifications, only qualifications and only papers".
According to the opinion, the evaluation title will change greatly in the future: posts with low requirements for foreign languages and computers do not need to take foreign languages and computers; Thesis is no longer a "hard lever", and teaching plans, medical records and other achievements can also be replaced; All professional titles are set to senior, and primary school teachers can also evaluate "professors"; The "one-vote veto system" for academic fraud will be implemented, and all titles obtained through fraud will be revoked.
Foreign languages and computers are no longer unified.
— —
Obviously, the job requirements for foreign languages are not high, or even irrelevant to foreign languages, but if you fail the foreign language examination, you will not be able to evaluate your professional title. This criticized phenomenon will be changed.
The opinion puts forward that there is no uniform requirement for the professional title foreign language and computer application ability examination. If it is really necessary to evaluate the level of foreign languages and computers, the employer or the evaluation institution shall independently determine the evaluation conditions.
At the same time, professional and technical personnel working in hard and remote areas and at the grassroots level, as well as professional title series and posts with low requirements for foreign languages and computer skills, are not required to have professional titles in foreign languages and computer application ability.
That is to say, in the future, jobs with low requirements for foreign languages and computers can be exempted from taking foreign languages and computers.
The reporter of Zhongxin. com noticed that many places have issued notices at present, and the foreign language level is no longer linked to the professional title evaluation. For example, the Beijing Municipal Bureau of Human Resources and Social Security recently issued the "Notice on Issues Related to Beijing Professional Title Foreign Language and Computer Application Ability Examination", clarifying that from January 1, 2017, the professional title foreign language level examination and computer application ability examination will not be used as the necessary conditions for applying for professional title evaluation.
Thesis is no longer a "hard lever"
— — Results such as lesson plans and medical records can also be substituted.
The tendency of "only papers" will also be corrected. The opinion requires that the conditions of papers and scientific research achievements in the evaluation of professional titles should be set reasonably, and papers should not be used as restrictive conditions for evaluating applied talents.
At the same time, the professional and technical personnel who work in hard and remote areas and at the grassroots level should be diluted or not required to make papers; For the series of professional titles with strong practicality and operability and unclear research attributes, no paper requirements are required.
In addition, explore the patent achievements, project reports, work summaries, engineering plans, design documents, teaching plans, medical records and other results to replace the paper requirements; Carry out the representative work system, focus on the research results and the quality of creative works, and dilute the number of papers.
For a long time, publishing papers has been a pain for many professional and technical personnel. In reality, it is difficult for doctors with excellent medical skills and teachers with strong teaching ability to break through the "hard lever" of "not publishing papers and evaluating titles". This also breeds chaos and industry interest chains such as paper fraud and plagiarism, spending money to send papers.
In the opinion of experts, papers are no longer a rigid requirement for evaluating professional titles, so that people can have more time to concentrate on their jobs instead of trying to distribute papers. Instead of papers, teaching plans, medical records and other forms of results are more in line with the law of talent evaluation. With the implementation of measures, the chaos in related industries is also expected to be improved.
All title series are set to positive advanced level.
— — Primary school teachers can also evaluate "professors"
In terms of title series, the opinion proposes to continue to use the title series in the fields of engineering, health, agriculture, economy, accounting, statistics, translation, press and publication, radio and television, art, teachers, scientific research, etc., cancel individual title series that are not suitable for economic and social development, and integrate title series with similar professional attributes.
Among them, each title series is provided with junior, intermediate and senior titles, in which senior titles are divided into senior and deputy senior titles, and junior titles are divided into assistant and clerk grades, and only assistant grades can be set according to needs. At present, the title series without positive and senior titles are all set to positive and senior titles.
Previously, accounting, primary and secondary school teachers and other professional title series did not have full and senior titles. After the reform, it will break through the "ceiling" of these people’s careers and greatly expand the career development space of professionals. It is also possible for primary school teachers to be rated as "professors" in primary schools.
Implement the "one-vote veto system" for academic fraud
— — The title obtained by fraud will be revoked.
The opinion puts forward that moral character should be put in the first place in the evaluation of professional and technical personnel, and the professional ethics of professional and technical personnel should be emphatically investigated.
At the same time, we will improve the disciplinary mechanism of good faith commitment and dishonesty, implement the "one-vote veto system" for academic fraud, and revoke all titles obtained through fraud, black-box operation and other violations.
Previously, under the tendency of "only papers", academic fraud and other phenomena emerged one after another. Last year, there were media reports that a large number of papers by Dr. China were suspected of plagiarism or ghostwriting in Brazilian academic journals.
It can be expected that with the paper no longer being a rigid requirement for evaluating professional titles and the implementation of the "one-vote veto system" for academic fraud, the practice of fraud in order to obtain professional titles will be greatly reduced. (End)